![petz 5 linux petz 5 linux](https://media.indiedb.com/images/games/1/77/76412/auto/zpellcatz_quest_dial.gif)
To avoid the complexity I’m going to use iSCSI for the root filesystem for each pi. This seems like a bit of an overkill in complexity. Or alternately I’d need to manage ALL accounts centrally on the Synology for all the pi’s.
#PETZ 5 LINUX FULL#
However that means every account on the pi would end up having full admin access over everything. To continue using NFS for the root filesystem I will need to either run in an insecure configuration: you can map every single vid on the client to the admin account on the Synology and then grant full access to the files on the Synology. Hence the access was denied by the NFS server. There was no account on my Synology NAS with a UIDs of 109. As I was using sec=sys for authentication all the authentication is based on UIDs. The problem was a mismatch between UIDs between the Synology NAS server and the bind account on the pi. Resolution on Bind9 on NFSĪfter a good bit of investigation and thinking… the problem with bind9 has nothing to do with bind9. The breakout board may now be placed on the breadboard.įinally we can now connect the Segger J-Link Mini EDU. The Nano is then placed on the board the SWCLK and SWDIO are carefully routed to their pins on the breakout board. Rather than attempt to repair the board (for which i don’t really have the right tools) I decided to simply take the RESETN signal from the header. At that point I realized that it was the RESETN and that signal is also available on Pin 13 of the Nano header.
![petz 5 linux petz 5 linux](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Petz-Dogz-2_1.jpg)
While reviewing videos on repairing PCBs I decided to go double check which wire was ripped off. Reviewing the board and the photos the hot glue was probably not making sufficient contact with the board over the white wire. I was being very careful while stripping the wire but it must have slipped. While assembling, the White Wire, Pin 6 (RESETN) ripped off the board ? A most unhappy moment. We’ll run the wires so they are neat and go under each board. Now we start to layout the board with our wires. We’ll run the wires down the central channel to maintain clearance under the Nano.
![petz 5 linux petz 5 linux](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCq56E1WQAMv44D.jpg)
Here we’ll wire the 3.3 volt reference to Pin 2, pickup ground from Pin 14. Now we start assembling the solderless breadboard. Step 1 is to solder the wires to the Nano.Īpplying some hot glue (should) help keep the wires in place. To minimize the number of wires to solder I decided to pull SWCLK, SWDIO, and RESETN (turned out to be a bad idea) from the pads. All these signals are available on the bottom of the Nano board. The SWD debugging interface needs GND, the 3.3v Reference, SWCLK, SWDIO, and RESETN. I’ve used a solderless breadboard with my Nano 33 BLE Sense and an Adafruit SWD Breakout Board ( ) to build a debugging and breadboard setup. Some approaches show soldering dupont wires to the pads and then connecting to the J-Link via and adapter. Normally you would use some form of test fixture and pogo pins to connect to the pads. The pads on the bottom of the Nanos are very small (and as we’ll see later quite fragile). These pads expose the SWD interface that enable debugging when used with an SWD compatible debugger such as the Segger J-Link Mini EDU ( ). The Arduino Nano 33 BLE (Sense) and the Nano 33 IoT expose SWD pads on the bottom of the board. SWD Breakout and Breadboard for Nano 33 BLE Sense This saved months of rerunning HyperBackup to fully rebuild the backup images. Once I did this I could restart the HyperBackup jobs and they detected the existence of the files. I set the file ownership of these files to the same account used to run the rsync. Once fully canceled I copied the old rsync files into the new backup locations. I then canceled them shortly after they started. To work around these issues what I was able to do was create new rsync single copy backup jobs in HyperBackup with the same source as the existing jobs but pointing to new backup locations. I also tried building new jobs using the targets of the copied files but this would error out because HyperBackup would report that files already existed in the target directories. This did not work as I couldn’t reset the name of the share where the files were to be backed up to. I thought I could just repoint the existing Hyper Backup jobs on the Synology rack station. I wanted to reuse the existing rsync files to avoid the several months necessary to build a new backup. The main use of the old ReadyNAS was an a rsync target for backing up my main Synology rack station. I recently upgraded a very old Netgear ReadyNAS device to a new Synology DS-420+ at a remote location.